Whether hurricanes are increasing in ferocity and number is worth arguing to a college audience because natural disasters affect us all and we should learn whether more precautions are needed.
I do not think that people disagree with the number of people dying from cancer. Everyone knows a lot of people die from this disease, so it does not need to be argued.
Informing college students about better diets in general is a good cause because your diet today is your health tomorrow, so this is especially true if the diet helps prevent a certain disease such as heart disease.
Arguing about the surrender of the Japanese in 1945 is irrelevant for college students of today because it is so far in the past and it cannot be changed anyway.
Whether more male teachers would help boys through primary education is not worth arguing to college students because they are through this grade level and most have no kids, so this knowledge would not be helpful to them.
This is definitely worth arguing because racial discrimination permeates through all grade levels and ages and backgrounds.
The availability of jobs for college grads is an extremely relevant topic to argue to college students because they are studying to get a job after college.
Whether hydrogen will be a viable fuel is not worth arguing to college students because they have no control over the production or regulation of this product.
I do not think that arguing that only one of the presidents has been catholic is an important argument in the first place because we are a nation of free religion so it should not matter.
The patriot act is definitely worth discussing with college students. They of all groups specifically tend to believe and care for the right of free expression.
No comments:
Post a Comment